Development of Transportation paper
Development of Transportation Rubric
30 points
April 9th 2012
Category |
5 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Introduction (Organization) |
The introduction is inviting, states the main topic & position and previews the structure of the paper |
The introduction clearly states the main topic & position and previews the structure of the paper but is not particularly inviting to the reader. |
The introduction states the main topic or position and does not adequately previews the structure of the paper nor is it particularly inviting to the reader. |
There is no clear introduction of the main topic, position or structure of the paper. |
Focus on Topic (Content) |
There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main idea stands out and is supported by detailed information. |
Main idea is clear but the supporting information is general. |
Main idea is somewhat clear but there is a need for more supporting information. |
The main idea is not clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information. |
Support for Thesis (content) |
Relevant, telling, quality details give the reader important information the goes beyond the obvious or predictable. |
Supporting details and information are relevant, but one key issues or portion of the storyline is unsupported. |
Supporting details and information are relevant, but several key issues or portions of the storyline are unsupported. |
Supporting details and information are typically unclear or not related to the topic. |
Conclusion (Organization) |
The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand what the writer is “getting at.” |
The conclusion is recognizable and ties up most loose ends. |
The conclusion is recognizable, but does not tie up loose ends. |
There is no clear conclusion, the paper just ends. |
Grammar & Spelling/ Citations (Conventions) |
Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distracts the reader from the content. All works are properly cited. |
Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from content. 1 missing citation. |
Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from content. 2 – 3 missing citations. |
Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from content. 4+ missing citations. |
All components present: Thesis Pre-write Draft Revision notes Paper – cover page, paper (double spaced, 5+ paragraphs), bibliography |
Has all components |
Missing 1 component |
Missing 2-3 components |
Missing 4+ components |
Game Assignment
Game Assignment Rubric
20 points
Top of Form
Excellent |
Average |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Deadline |
Excellent Game was ready to present on the due date. |
Average The presentation of the game was 1 day late. |
Fair The presentation of the game was 2 days late. |
Poor The presentation of the game was 3 or more days late. |
Content |
Excellent The game was well thought out and clearly addressed a literacy skill. |
Average The game was well thought out and but did not clearly addressed a literacy skill. |
Fair The game was not well thought out and was only basic in its content. |
Poor The game did not address any literacy skill. |
Report: Rules of the Game |
Excellent Rules of the game are clear and complete. The How to Play guide is clear and understandable. |
Average Rules of the game were somewhat difficult to understand or were incomplete. |
Fair Rules of the game were fairly difficult to understand and were somewhat incomplete. |
Poor Rules of the game were extremely difficult to understand and were incomplete. |
Report: Structure |
Excellent Structured in such a way that: 1. How to play/Rules are clearly stated 2. Equipment is listed and provided 3. Assignment is typed |
Average Structure is missing 1 required component. |
Fair Structure is missing 2 required components. |
Poor Structure is missing 3 required components. |
Spelling, Grammar, & Punctuation |
Excellent Grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed, spelling is correct; language is clear and precise. |
Average Rules/How-to contains little grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors; language lacks clarity. |
Fair Rules/How-to contains many grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors; language lacks clarity. |
Poor Rules/How-to contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. |